* Sign up for your FREE Report & FREE Updates at the very bottom of any page.
"How to Respond to an Anti-Conspiracy Theorist"
September 13, 2023
Slimes Caption: A destroyed neighborhood in Lahaina, Hawaii, last month. China has made the wildfires a target of disinformation.
China Sows Disinformation About Hawaii Fires Using New Techniques
China’s most recent influence campaign suggests that it is making more direct attempts to sow discord in the United States.
By David Sanger and Steven Lee Meyers
Rebuttal By
A raw nerve has evidently been struck at the "paper of record" by all of the online "conspiracy theorists" ™ asserting that last month's bizarre fires in Maui, Hawaii -- and so many others worldwide in years past -- were caused by exotic Deep State DEW (Directed Energy Weapons). More so than the previous occurrences, these fires seem to have generated a bit more suspicion and awareness of DEWs. That's "good news" for us truthers, but very worrisome for (((the usual suspects))) -- so much so that the bosses at Manhattan's Mendacity Factory have trotted out not one, but two, "Pulitzer Prize winning" jewnalists from their stable of seditious screamers.
David Sanger (cough cough) and Steven Lee Meyers (cough cough) don't just "debunk" the claims; but take it a step further by falsely blaming China (Xi Jinping) for covertly spreading disinformation about Maui fires through the use of Artificial Intelligence images and propaganda posts. It's a "twofer!" A bit of the absurd libel -- "supported by" unnamed researchers -- from the article:
"When wildfires swept across Maui last month with destructive fury, China’s increasingly resourceful information warriors pounced.
The disaster was not natural, they said in a flurry of false posts that spread across the internet, but was the result of a secret “weather weapon” being tested by the United States. To bolster the plausibility, the posts carried photographs that appeared to have been generated by artificial intelligence programs, making them among the first to use these new tools to bolster the aura of authenticity of a disinformation campaign.
For China — which largely stood on the sidelines of the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections while Russia ran hacking operations and disinformation campaigns — the effort to cast the wildfires as a deliberate act by American intelligence agencies and the military was a rapid change of tactics." * Translation: Oy vey! More and more people are discovering the truth about Jewish Space Lasers! Let's label it Chinese Disinformation!
The disaster was not natural, they said in a flurry of false posts that spread across the internet, but was the result of a secret “weather weapon” being tested by the United States. To bolster the plausibility, the posts carried photographs that appeared to have been generated by artificial intelligence programs, making them among the first to use these new tools to bolster the aura of authenticity of a disinformation campaign.
For China — which largely stood on the sidelines of the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections while Russia ran hacking operations and disinformation campaigns — the effort to cast the wildfires as a deliberate act by American intelligence agencies and the military was a rapid change of tactics." * Translation: Oy vey! More and more people are discovering the truth about Jewish Space Lasers! Let's label it Chinese Disinformation!
Steven Lee Meyers and David Sanger are falsely accusing China (Russia gets a break) of spreading "disinfo" about the Maui fires and secret CIA weaponry.
Before she was elected to the military-run Congress which is not actually in session at this time -- Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) had once tweeted about her suspicion that space-based lasers caused fires. In a totally unrelated post, she had also mentioned the Rothschilds. The two posts were mockingly conflated into "Jewish Space Lasers" -- the title of a book by "Mike Rothschild" -- whose "debunk" writings and TV appearances continue to generate welcome free publicity for us truthers. We suspect that he is a White Hat.
The Slimes article itself is infested with sneakily qualifying slogans, such as "researchers say" -- "early indications" -- "suggests" -- "appears to be" -- "no direct evidence." Sadly, the cretinous clods who worship this wicked writ won't catch the devious disclaimers. What's interesting is that Microsoft President, Brad Smith -- based on what his company's researchers have told him -- does "confirm" that the fake images seem to have Chinese fingerprints all over them. Could it be that phony images (and phony death counts) are indeed circulating, with the Chinese (unbeknown to Smith) now being framed for the disinfo? If that is so, that would raise some questions, such as:
* Why fake the images in such a way as to point to DEWs?
* Who would benefit from such a thing?
* Was this event even real -- or real but embellished?
* Are all of those "children" actually missing?
There has been and continues to be so much that is "off" about this alleged tragedy in Maui -- not the least of which was the horrible, insensitive and politically self-damaging response to it all by that White Hat imposter working out of a fake "White House" and "Oval Office" --- aka "Joe Biden." Could at least some of the photos have been faked as part of a White Hat operation to introduce the idea of DEWs to more people? Have we heard the last of the story about the Hawaii fires? (evidently not, as this Slimes article shows).
For our comfort level, there is just not enough data to call this one as Black Hat reality or White Hat fakery. That very insufficiency of information can work both ways. Stay tuned on this one.
New York Post
Daily Mail (UK)
Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that the Chinese are circulating fake images and baseless conspiracy theories about the fires in Hawaii.
Boobus Americanus 2: You mean, like Jewish Space Lasers? Ha ha ha..
*
St Sugar: Tell it, Margie. Tell it!
Editor: DEWs were also used on 9-11-2001.
Comments
(All comments are read, but not always responded to)
(All comments are read, but not always responded to)